Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 729 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Houston And Galveston results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 265 hits . Analysis detected 2,804 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,207 of 36,070 keywords). This Houston And Galveston is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group. Houston And Galveston
Keyword details
Total words: 2,916
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst