Keyword summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Agriculture Committee results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 869 hits. Analysis detected 4,302 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,400 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (17,993 of 37,536 keywords). This House Agriculture Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
House Agriculture Committee
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,400
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510052.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.8%19.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos