Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,745 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hot Girls Read results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 868 hits. Analysis detected 6,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (21,689 of 35,635 keywords). This Hot Girls Read is better (less manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Hot Girls Read
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠40%Hot Girls Read (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,980
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510039.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos