Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Holocaust Denial results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 401 hits. Analysis detected 4,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,950 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Holocaust Denial is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Holocaust Denial
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Holocaust Denial (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,950
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.0%7.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos