Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Holocaust Denial results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Ad Hominem , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 401 hits . Analysis detected 4,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,950 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Holocaust Denial is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Holocaust Denial
Keyword details
Total words: 4,950
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst