Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hockey Canada results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 390 hits . Analysis detected 2,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,384 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,831 of 37,536 keywords). This Hockey Canada is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Hockey Canada
Keyword details
Total words: 4,384
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst