Keyword summary
32% 2 analyzed articles/videos 364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hijabs results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 564 hits . Analysis detected 3,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,228 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (26,328 of 34,787 keywords). This Hijabs is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group. Hijabs
Keyword details
Total words: 4,228
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst