Keyword summary
32%2 analyzed articles/videos364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hijabs results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 564 hits. Analysis detected 3,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,228 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (26,328 of 34,787 keywords). This Hijabs is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Hijabs
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
25%Hijabs (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,228
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510024.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos