Keyword summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video3,039 analyzed words
BS Summary: These High Point results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 3,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (43,555 of 43,898 keywords). This High Point is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group.
High Point
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wyomings Big Show1%
⁠0%Wyoming's Big Show1%
⁠0%Sweetwater Events Complex1%
⁠0%Ffa1%
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠1%High Point (selected)1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751000.8% percentile
0.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos