Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These High Deductible Health Plan results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 79.9% saturation with 1,182 hits. Analysis detected 1,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,479 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (810 of 37,536 keywords). This High Deductible Health Plan is worse (more manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group.
High Deductible Health Plan
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,479
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

98% percentile
025507510097.8% percentile
14.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 79.9%79.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Keyword 79.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos