Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hegseth Pentagon Defense Combat Women Trump results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 385 hits. Analysis detected 3,684 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Hegseth Pentagon Defense Combat Women Trump is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hegseth Pentagon Defense Combat Women Trump
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,152
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos