Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,284 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hearings House Of Representatives Politics results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.1% saturation with 1,062 hits. Analysis detected 5,766 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,605 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (16,508 of 37,536 keywords). This Hearings House Of Representatives Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Hearings House Of Representatives Politics
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,605
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510056.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.5%15.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 23.1%23.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos