Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Healthy Food Access results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 150 hits . Analysis detected 1,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Healthy Food Access is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Healthy Food Access
Keyword details
Total words: 2,160
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst