Keyword summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video709 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Care Fraud results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 2,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (25,534 of 54,889 keywords). This Health Care Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Health Care Fraud
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠54%Health Care Fraud (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,836
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

54% percentile
025507510053.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos