Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hdhp results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anchoring Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 79.9% saturation with 1,182 hits . Analysis detected 1,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,479 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.6% and a BS Rank of 98% (808 of 37,536 keywords). This Hdhp is worse (more manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group. Hdhp
Keyword details
Total words: 1,479
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.9% percentile 14.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 79.9% 79.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Framing Effect: Keyword 79.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst