Keyword summary
24% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hazardous Waste results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 650 hits . Analysis detected 5,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,581 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (33,630 of 35,635 keywords). This Hazardous Waste is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group. Hazardous Waste
Keyword details
Total words: 9,581
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst