Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video986 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hazardous Chemicals results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 381 hits. Analysis detected 2,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (26,393 of 35,596 keywords). This Hazardous Chemicals is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Hazardous Chemicals
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
26%Hazardous Chemicals (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,944
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510025.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos