Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hayat Tahrir Al Sham results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 860 hits . Analysis detected 6,767 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (26,956 of 37,536 keywords). This Hayat Tahrir Al Sham is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. Hayat Tahrir Al Sham
Keyword details
Total words: 7,828
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst