Keyword summary
45%3 analyzed articles/videos2,195 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Havana results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 1,376 hits. Analysis detected 6,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,437 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,937 of 37,536 keywords). This Havana is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Havana
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
37%Havana (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,437
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate