Keyword summary
38%1 analyzed article/video884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hard Clutch Engagement results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 285 hits. Analysis detected 1,698 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (36,042 of 51,243 keywords). This Hard Clutch Engagement is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Hard Clutch Engagement
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
30%Hard Clutch Engagement (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,536
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510029.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos