Keyword summary
55% 1 analyzed article/video 759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Natanson results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 477 hits . Analysis detected 3,074 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (13,903 of 37,536 keywords). This Hannah Natanson is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group. Hannah Natanson
Keyword details
Total words: 3,036
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.0% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst