Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gus Van Sant results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 466 hits . Analysis detected 2,519 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,647 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of â 34% (25,006 of 37,536 keywords). This Gus Van Sant is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group. Gus Van Sant
Keyword details
Total words: 4,647
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst