Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Guo Wengui results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 595 hits . Analysis detected 2,717 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,801 of 37,536 keywords). This Guo Wengui is better (less manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group. Guo Wengui
Keyword details
Total words: 3,080
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 18.3% 18.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst