Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,644 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Guggenheim Abu Dhabi results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 1,647 hits . Analysis detected 7,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,907 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,849 of 37,536 keywords). This Guggenheim Abu Dhabi is worse (more manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group. Guggenheim Abu Dhabi
Keyword details
Total words: 4,907
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.7% percentile 7.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 31.1% 31.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 30.6% 30.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 33.6% 33.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 33.6%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 31.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 30.6%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst