Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Guests Taylor Swift Travis Kelce Wedding Jewels Millions Expensive results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 1,212 hits. Analysis detected 4,960 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (11,674 of 37,536 keywords). This Guests Taylor Swift Travis Kelce Wedding Jewels Millions Expensive is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Guests Taylor Swift Travis Kelce Wedding Jewels Millions Expensive
Keyword details
Total words: 5,124
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 23.6%23.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 17.0%17.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 23.6%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos