Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gubernatorial Campaign results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 734 hits. Analysis detected 4,680 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,512 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,139 of 35,668 keywords). This Gubernatorial Campaign is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Gubernatorial Campaign
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
64%Gubernatorial Campaign (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,512
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate