Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,096 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greta Garbo results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 1,440 hits . Analysis detected 5,753 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,767 of 37,536 keywords). This Greta Garbo is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Greta Garbo
Keyword details
Total words: 3,288
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.6% percentile 8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 27.3% 27.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 43.8% 43.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 19.3% 19.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 43.8%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 27.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst