Keyword summary
89%2 analyzed articles/videos3,083 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Sargent results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 2,153 hits. Analysis detected 13,130 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,067 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,770 of 37,536 keywords). This Greg Sargent is better (less manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Greg Sargent
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
26%Greg Sargent (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 16,067
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 13.4%13.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos