Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,068 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg James results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 376 hits. Analysis detected 2,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,382 of 37,536 keywords). This Greg James is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Greg James
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
41%Greg James (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,272
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510040.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos