Keyword summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,863 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Biffle results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,177 hits. Analysis detected 10,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,493 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,355 of 37,538 keywords). This Greg Biffle is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Greg Biffle
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
49%Greg Biffle (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,493
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510048.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate