Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Green River results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 1,298 hits . Analysis detected 9,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,062 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,286 of 37,536 keywords). This Green River is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group. Green River
Keyword details
Total words: 8,062
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst