Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Green Rhino results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 57.9% saturation with 2,469 hits . Analysis detected 13,169 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,263 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of â 93% (2,971 of 37,536 keywords). This Green Rhino is worse (more manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group. Green Rhino
Keyword details
Total words: 4,263
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.1% percentile 8.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 57.9% 57.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 48.1% 48.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 38.9% 38.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 30.2% 30.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% In-Group Bias: Keyword 57.9%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 48.1%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 38.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.2%, sitewide 19.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Straw Man: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst