Keyword summary
65% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Green New Deal results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,827 hits . Analysis detected 17,162 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,904 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (27,289 of 35,668 keywords). This Green New Deal is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Green New Deal
Keyword details
Total words: 18,904
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst