Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greater St Louis Inc results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 2,650 hits . Analysis detected 15,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,964 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,476 of 37,536 keywords). This Greater St Louis Inc is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Greater St Louis Inc
Keyword details
Total words: 17,964
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles18K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst