Keyword summary
93% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greater Manchester results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,145 hits . Analysis detected 10,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,874 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (17,998 of 35,604 keywords). This Greater Manchester is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Greater Manchester
Keyword details
Total words: 8,874
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst