Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great White Hope results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 761 hits. Analysis detected 5,717 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (16,050 of 37,536 keywords). This Great White Hope is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Great White Hope
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
58%Great White Hope (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,728
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 13.4%13.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.4%6.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 16.1%16.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos