Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great Green Wall China results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 106 hits . Analysis detected 1,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,825 of 37,530 keywords). This Great Green Wall China is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Great Green Wall China
Keyword details
Total words: 2,324
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst