Keyword summary
19% 1 analyzed article/video 604 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great Cyclone Of 1896 results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 329 hits . Analysis detected 1,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (15,152 of 34,568 keywords). This Great Cyclone Of 1896 is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group. Great Cyclone Of 1896
Keyword details
Total words: 2,416
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.2% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst