Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Graphic Novels results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 927 hits. Analysis detected 7,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,304 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,169 of 37,536 keywords). This Graphic Novels is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Graphic Novels
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
33%Graphic Novels (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,304
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos