Keyword summary
8%1 analyzed article/video1,694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grant Program results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 2,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (42,155 of 43,898 keywords). This Grant Program is better (less manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group.
Grant Program
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Wyomings Big Show1%
0%Wyoming's Big Show1%
0%Sweetwater Events Complex1%
0%Ffa1%
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
4%Grant Program (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,776
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751004.0% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos