Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 791 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grand Central Slasher results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 446 hits . Analysis detected 3,631 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,617 of 37,536 keywords). This Grand Central Slasher is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Grand Central Slasher
Keyword details
Total words: 3,164
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.4% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst