Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gowanus results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 1,294 hits. Analysis detected 7,698 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,656 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,587 of 37,536 keywords). This Gowanus is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Gowanus
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
43%Gowanus (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,656
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510042.5% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 10.6%10.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate