Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,914 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gowanus results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 1,294 hits . Analysis detected 7,698 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,656 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,587 of 37,536 keywords). This Gowanus is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group. Gowanus
Keyword details
Total words: 7,656
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst