Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Government Appointments And Nominations results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 616 hits. Analysis detected 4,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,875 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Government Appointments And Nominations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Government Appointments And Nominations
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,875
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.6%12.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos