Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video214 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government-And-Institutions results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 388 faulty-reasoning hits from 856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (5,795 of 37,536 keywords). This Government-And-Institutions is worse (more manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group.
Government-And-Institutions
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 856
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

85% percentile
025507510084.6% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles856 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.2%18.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos