Keyword summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video1,293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gov Josh Shapiros Commission On LGBTQ Affairs results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 675 hits. Analysis detected 4,846 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,612 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (48,667 of 56,410 keywords). This Gov Josh Shapiros Commission On LGBTQ Affairs is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Gov Josh Shapiros Commission On LGBTQ Affairs
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 8,612
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510013.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos