Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video320 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gorillas results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 595 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,280 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,457 of 37,536 keywords). This Gorillas is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Gorillas
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
51%Gorillas (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,280
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos