Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gop Senators results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.5% saturation with 752 hits. Analysis detected 3,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 87% (4,874 of 35,014 keywords). This Gop Senators is worse (more manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Gop Senators
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
87%Gop Senators (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,728
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510086.1% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 43.5%43.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.2%4.2%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 43.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 29.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%No True Scotsman: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Middle Ground: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos