Keyword summary
74% 1 analyzed article/video 1,625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Good Jobs results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,028 hits . Analysis detected 6,775 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,088 of 35,675 keywords). This Good Jobs is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group. Good Jobs
Keyword details
Total words: 6,500
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.5% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst