Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Golden-State Warriors results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 284 hits. Analysis detected 1,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (8,649 of 35,445 keywords). This Golden-State Warriors is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Golden-State Warriors
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
76%Golden-State Warriors (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 25.8%25.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate