Keyword summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video501 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Economic Integration results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 37.6% saturation with 565 hits. Analysis detected 3,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,503 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (2,313 of 37,536 keywords). This Global Economic Integration is worse (more manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group.
Global Economic Integration
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,503
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

94% percentile
025507510093.8% percentile
9.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 37.6%37.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 27.1%27.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.4%20.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Keyword 37.6%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Straw Man: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos