Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Global Crackdown results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 506 hits. Analysis detected 5,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,355 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Global Crackdown is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Global Crackdown
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Global Crackdown (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,355
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 20.3%20.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 13.1%13.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 17.8%17.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.5%16.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 21.5%21.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos