Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video769 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glioblastoma results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 987 hits. Analysis detected 2,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,367 of 37,536 keywords). This Glioblastoma is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Glioblastoma
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
75%Glioblastoma (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,076
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510075.0% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 32.1%32.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Keyword 32.1%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Halo EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos